The Pirate Party of Greece on the Far-Right Meddling with Human Rights

In horror and disgust, we read that Mr. Alain Berset, Secretary General of the Council of Europe, seems to be accepting the Right/Far-Right bloc’s insolent demand to revise the the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).[1]

For many years now, the Right/Far-Right coalition seeks to undermine humanitarian and democratic values and gut all legislation that protects human rights. For many years, through anti-democratic think tanks like the “liberal” Atlas Network and the extreme fascist Heritage Foundation, it has been promoting historical revisionism, a change in the very meaning of words, and regression. Of course, it has “authoritative” scribes in oligarch-owned “mainstream” media and moles in the Academia by its side: these groups have both been hard at work, for decades now, to whitewash fascism and Nazism.

Funded by dark money and by fascist multi-billionaires like Peter Thiel, Robert Mercer, and Elon Musk, and aided by the daily and incessant misanthropic and terror-mongering propaganda of their media, which has turned the masses into angry, goose-stepping mobs, the Right now feels safe to show its true intentions. It wants to return us to the days of Franco, Mussolini, and Hitler. The Right was never the power of “prudence”, “moderation”, “stability”, or “unity”. It has always been, as History teaches us, the very womb of fascism, discord, inhumanity, and human abattoirs. It has always presented all sorts of social groups as “subhuman” and “savages” that must be exterminated and erased: Jews, Roma, Muslims, the LGBTQI+ community (especially trans folk), people with disabilities, Palestinians, refugees and migrants. When, of course, it took a break from turning private sector workers against their public sector peers; pensioners against students; men against women.

In no way shall we accept any regression in human rights, and especially w.r.t. the more vulnerable groups, like refugees who try to flee the neo-colonial wars instigated and funded by the Neo-fascist International. We declare outright that we shall show absolutely no tolerance to the neo-fascist rhetoric of the unhinged Right. We declare that we shall not recognize or accept any text that makes concessions to the neo-Nazis and the fascists. Finally, we remind Mr. Berset that human rights are not privileges granted to the plebs by the sovereign. They are not subject to demagogic “polls” and “plebiscites” rife with weasel words and manipulative questions aimed at stoking social automatism, and fear and lothing for the Other. They cannot be the subject of obscene horse trading and political “balances”. If Mr. Berset actually wants to honor his position and his institutional role, he must stand up to vulgar fascists like Kemi Badenoch, Giorgia Meloni, Mette Frederiksen (who has the audacity to pretend to be a social-democrat!), the racist Geert Wilders, the petit-dictateur Viktor Orbán, the risible Bart De Wever; if he does not have the spine and rectitude to do that, he must hand in his resignation.

True to our humanitarian values, true to our Pirate Ideology (which, contrary to what some claim, is neither nebulous nor “ill-defined”), we declare unanimously, unequivocally, and officially that we shall fight with all our powers against the fascistization promoted by the European People’s Party and its neo-fascist allies. We call on all democratic and progressive powers in Europe to a mass, unyielding, and united struggle against the Right’s obscene campaign, before it is too late.

  1. Magee, C. (2025). Convention on human rights must adapt, says Council of Europe head. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/05/convention-on-human-rights-must-adapt-says-council-of-europe-head [Accessed 6 Jun. 2025].

Basically translated as “start talking, or you’re fascist”
Correct?

1 Like

3 posts were split to a new topic: Reaction to this post: https://www.pirateparty.gr/rethymno-declaration-gr/

No. But does your response basically mean you are triggered because you agree with Mr.Alain Berset and you want human right rolled back? Because the statement you quoted says “we shall fight with all our powers against the fascistization promoted by the European People’s Party and its neo-fascist allies”. Do you consider yourself an ally of EPP ? This is strange…

Now, why would I consider myself an ally to the most irresponsible (and pro-copyright) group in the European Parliament, then?

But I’m curious on another thing, though: it seems your chain of thought is based rather on attacking friends in order to get answers, instead of sincere argumentation and collaboration. This based on your reply, and your original post.

You must understand you are between friends here, and argumentative traps like “if you’re like EPP and their friends, you’re fascist” ( denominating others that don’t have anything to do with us to possibly extract “traitors” ) between educated people shows more than a tendency of coercion and inquisition, and it’s quite highly visible among many of the pirate viewers. Especially that most probably we all have activist background and past, and we know how a inquisition looks.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m thoroughly for a inquisition in the Pirate Parties in order to extract anti-pirates between our parties, we had quite a ton.

But this is a friendly reminder that even though many of us most probably agree with most of the things you support, this type of aggressive argumentation trap will inevitably alienate everyone. And will alienate your crusade from the others (in EUPP) as well, implicitly this type of argumentation trap will rather push your potential allies to the Right, achieving the opposite effect.
Especially that your methods and argumentation are not divinely and absolutely the only way, hopefully you don’t consider them as such.

So I have to kindly ask again: is your personally take going as “start talking, or you’re friends of the fascists”?

1 Like

I am not going to argue the definition of fascism, or the error of polite politics againt far right and fascists. However, rolling back human rights is fascist. Simple as that.

I propose that you read on the paradox of tolerance.

You’re going around the subject, and most probably have not read what I said.

Even though again I agree with the core of what you are saying in this last reply, without any doubts, I also see that in this case your type of argumentation is avoidance of subject - and this is a logical error. I hope it’s not intentional.

Please read again what I wrote last time.
For example:

You must understand you are between friends here, (…) ( denominating others that don’t have anything to do with us to possibly extract “traitors” ) between educated shows more than a tendency of coercion and inquisition. (…) And will alienate your crusade from the others* as well, implicitly this type of argumentation trap will rather push your potential allies to the Right, achieving the opposite effect.

In public school we learn a thing called Understanding and interpreting what the author tries to say.
What do you think I’m trying to tell you?

1 Like

If my “friends” are thinking of going to the right (that advocates for barbarism), it is not because I call them as they are. It is because they are barbarians. How is being polite to people that think some humans are less human… going to help?

I read and dismissed what you said because tolerance CANNOT be extended to intolerance.

You didn’t read and probably didn’t understand what I meant. But it’s perfectly fine.

But I’m asking you: what do you think of the consequences of your aggressive argumentation traps is going to take you, between pirates where there has never been no love for fascism, nor EPP?

Are you trying to extract some results or force pirate members to talk?
Because from my angle you’re:

  • accusing pirate friends of going “to the right”, out of nowhere
  • started a witch hunt inquisition in a group that has no love for coyright supporters like EPP, nor neo-conservatives like Bibi
  • talking about intolerance towards what I can see is a imaginary enemy, on EUPP Discourse, which generally nobody contradicts core of your observations

What are you hoping to achieve here, of all places?

1 Like

" accusing pirate friends of going “to the right”, out of nowhere"

Promoting alt-right propaganda is the cause. So… not “out of nowhere”

“started a witch hunt inquisition in a group that has no love for coyright supporters like EPP, nor neo-conservatives like Bibi”

We started nothing. Those who promote Israeli propaganda did. We responded

“talking about intolerance towards what I can see is a imaginary enemy, on EUPP Discourse, which generally nobody contradicts core of your observations”

I posted an article, I thought the PPEU aggreed with. You were triggered and started this. So, no.

I understand completely as do you.

Promoting alt-right propaganda is the cause. So… not “out of nowhere”

We started nothing. Those who promote Israeli propaganda did. We responded

Who, in EUPP organization, promotes alt-right propaganda?

I posted an article, I thought the PPEU aggreed with. You were triggered and started this. So, no.

I’m trying to help, and as I said numerous times I agree with quite many of the issues you wrote. Or maybe it’s a cultural thing to assume the worst out of your peers? Conversation is only natural, please do not assume I’m in a state of disapproval of your core issue. I’m trying to understand:

  • who in EUPP started what and where?
  • what are you hoping to achieve with this?
  • what are your requests?

But if you have some form of cognitive dissonance, I would like to know so I can back down.

1 Like

Davoodi, Khem, Kluver for starter. Check them out.

And by the way, this article had nothing to do with this. This is only about Human rights.

Davoodi, Khem, Kluver for starter. Check them out.

None of those people hold any positions within the European Pirate Party. Davoodi stod as a candidate for the Board last year, but withdrew his candidacy. The other two I don’t think I’ve ever seen in anything related to the European Pirates.

1 Like

They are prominent members that are featured in politics very often. Davoodi is a “security expert”, Kluver is a foreign policy maker and Khem… well Khem is just a pirate troll. Those were the people this board said a member of PPGR was harassing. You, not having heard about them, is not my concern.

1 Like

They are not prominent members of the European Pirates. They might be prominent within the German Pirate Party, but that doesn’t make them relevent at the European level.

That doesn’t sound overly prominent to me.

I am pretty sure the current board of the European Pirates haven’t made any such statement, but please point me to said statement if I am wrong.

I have heard of them, and also met some of them. But that is a bit beside the point. If you re-read my post you’ll see that I said I hadn’t seen them in things related to the European Pirates.