CEEP - Economy and Finance Chapter is ready

We have decided to split this part of the economic program into two modules.

Module 1 – Economic growth

Preamble

Our economic program aims to support long-term sustainable economic growth focused on long-term development, broad improvements in quality of life, and fostering a competitive, fair, and inventive economic environment. In this regard, we believe it is necessary to consider a broader set of economic metrics besides mere immediate gross productivity. Such measures must capture the development of long-term economic opportunities, well-being, environmental and social sustainability, and successful collaboration across the whole EU.

Justification by Bastian:

Unlimited growth in a materially limited world - it has been clear to economists since the 1970s that this is not possible. Why do we nevertheless fanatically cling to the dogma of economic growth?

It’s not that the economy is fundamentally bad. It’s just that the idea of growth has now degenerated from a means to an end in itself, to which we subordinate everything else. According to Welzer, this is due to the following three historical mistakes:

We underestimated what the ecological consequences of exploiting natural resources would be in the long run. This, in turn, is due to the fact that the global effects of the use of fossil raw materials were not yet foreseeable when industrialization got underway. Thus, for over a century, the new economic power could be seen as a savior in the fight against poverty and social injustice.

We have linked the financing of the welfare state to the economy. The state budget is financed to a considerable extent by taxing employment. This leads to an unfavorable linkage: when the economy goes into crisis and jobs are lost, the state loses revenue, which in turn destabilizes society as a whole. In this way, politics has harnessed itself to the cart of the private sector.

Economic growth has become a dogma that gives corporations too much power. The large corporations have the longer leverage. They can simply threaten governments with layoffs, plant closures or relocation if, for example, tax laws or environmental protection requirements don’t suit them.

The consequences of this entanglement are a danger to the environment and to democracy. Politics has become the extended arm of the economy. The state is walking a dangerous tightrope, balancing between social responsibility and economic coercion. By bailing out risk-taking banks and ailing corporations, it is interfering with the private sector and neglecting its obligation to its citizens to ensure a fair and sustainable distribution of wealth.

What we need is enlightened capitalism! The economy must be tamed so that it actually serves the common good. We must finally start thinking beyond the day-to-day business of realpolitik. We need to break away from the primacy of growth, which is pushing the environment and people ever further to the limits of their resilience. We need new models for a sustainable and equitable economy that no longer primarily serves the interests of small, privileged groups.

Module 2 – Economic Program

Competitive Economic Environment

The environment of all economic activity needs to facilitate resilience and competition, and to stimulate and enforce transparency. This incentivises social progress in a sustainable, fair, and democratic way. Pirates aim to protect individuals, preserve opportunities, promote individual autonomy and well-being by dispersing and de-concentrating public and private power. Competitive markets provide a fertile ground for entrepreneurship. Competition policy should aim to prevent excessive market concentration and monopolistic practices which pose barriers for new businesses to enter markets. Facilitating opportunities for entrepreneurship, including SMEs (Small and medium-sized enterprises) and Start-ups, leads to job creation, innovation, and economic dynamism, contributing to overall prosperity. An effective competition standard should look beyond consumer welfare, and be science-based. Rather than needing to sanction the abuse of a dominant position, competition policy should focus more on prevention of market power. Competition enforcement agencies should be adequately resourced, get institutional support, and a legal mandate. Ideally the competition authority must be independent and shielded from direct political interference.

Trade

Pirates believe that trade and cooperation is a way towards development and shared wealth. However, we see a lot of challenges in the current trade environment. At the same time, trade agreements have been abused in the past to empower private entities at the expense of public courts, exploit communities and promote nepotism and cronysm.

We propose basic principles that we will uphold regarding international trade. Considering trade treaties, the European Parliament must ratify the treaty and the treaty must be negotiated as transparently as possible, including public hearings and comprehensive access to information. Trade should be enlarging our markets and allowing more competition, therefore trade agreements should not give out more or less hidden special favours. The ultimate goal of international trade agreements is the positive development of all involved parties. Therefore, we need to always ask for at least the most basic working standards to be upheld by our trade partners and enforce paying up for common externalities damaging us all through carbon border adjustment mechanism and similar tools.

Trade is also an economical and political tool. We support economic sanctions against authoritarian regimes, especially the regimes that are actively undermining European security and commiting crimes against humanity. These sanctions should be precisely targeted to damage the wealth of the governemnt elites, hinder the offensive and persecuting capacities of those regimes and to avoid suffering of the common citizens as much as possible. We should not supply weapons and surveillance technologies to authoritarian regimes.

Last years have also seen a surge in protectionism and closing of free trade in critical technological areas like microchips or renewable energy technologies. We do believe that Europe should attain highest possible level of strategic autonomy concerning these and the need to reduce our overdependence on authoritarian regimes. Way to get that autonomy and prosperity is through trade with new partners, research, technological excellence and cooperation. Trade wars have repeatedly proven themselves detrimental.

Taxation

The tax mix should be based on establishing an environment of fully internalized externalities of economic activities to cultivate an entrepreneurial environment and a long-term well-developing society.

To achieve this, we propose the following points: Moving a larger part of the tax burden from labour to capital. To facilitate this, tax harmonization across European jurisdictions should be further developed. This should include targeting strategic capital allocation for tax avoidance, and intentional obscuring of corporate structure (incl. public entities). We should focus on empowering local communities’ decision-making and interests regarding their local tax structure together with establishing an all-European harmonization framework (yet not unification of tax rates or tax base definitions, only framework of the shared approach). We will support global coordination on taxation, particularly in questions of international corporations.

An addendum as module 3a & 3b in case this section is not included in the CEEP trade program :

[Examples:
3A.: Tax on Kerosine to ensure fair competition between means of transportation.

3B.: Tax on stock buybacks. Current income tax avoidance tool.

Financial Markets and Multinational Corporations

Regulation, supervision, and taxation of the financial markets should encourage investment into long-term development strategies which are environmentally and socially sustainable. The environment should deter financial dominance, capital concentration, and for-profit short-term reallocation (e.g., buy-backs). Speculative investments should bear heighten disincentives and should be more transparent.

European Budgetary Rules

Budgetary policy is an essential tool of economic policy. The current budgetary rules are targeted on preventing budgetary deficits and prevent members states to react in times of crisis.

We propose to discard and replace them with long term budget sustainability assessments, and to prevent excessive budgetary imbalances.

This will allow member states to implement investment policies in spite of the defense, environmental and social challenges of our time, as well as encourage the balancing of their savings and consumption which will foster a dynamic internal market.

European Economic Integration

The next steps of European economic integration should support labour mobility, equality, and broad economic development of all European regions. Further, there should be continued support for the economic development of physical and institutional infrastructure, particularly of cross-border regions.

Cryptocurrency

We as Pirates see the potential of crypto assets and that they may have a positive role in economic development. We want to protect cash for its anonymity including digital cash.

Additional justification for using cryptocurrencies by Bastian:

Leaving your money in your account or savings book is not a good idea either. Legally, the money in your account does not belong to you, but to the bank. In principle, you are giving the bank a free loan. Only when you withdraw the money are you officially the owner.

Moreover, both the bank and the state can easily access the money in your account. Even if your bank were to go bust, you would quickly be rid of the money in your account. What’s the alternative? Put your money in a crypto wallet, there it is your property. Even in an emergency, the bank is not allowed to access it.

2 Likes

To make sure I understand: What is the plan with the parts in italics?

To the text: The main difference is in your first sentence in the preamble, right? Maybe firstly, would it be possible to reword it so it doesn’t repeat the expression “long-term” twice?

And also, can we maybe post it to the main channel that we had going on rather than opening yet another channel? Before Strasbourg, we had many scattered posts around and nobody knew where to discuss the topic, we’re trying to avoid it… from what I know, there are other people that follow the other one as well. Thanks!

1 Like

I hope that’s ok with you @Bastian I am going to repost the text itself into the other channel so we can finalize it/agree with it before tomorrow’s Board.

Continuing the discussion from the previous main channel ( Economy and Finances Chapter (official version from the joint collaboration)) here:

Summarizing the current stage of the discussion. I took out the 2 footnotes: 1. it was agreed with the author of the transportation chapter (@Zireael) to include a note regarding tax on kerosine there (@Danny), 2. stock buybacks note is now part of the main body (@wab). I took out the references to “Modules” (I missed the part where it was discussed so not sure if that’s something that is supposed to be part of the main text but didn’t feel like it). Unless I missed/forgot something, the text below should be finalized except the final agreement on the Preamble, is that correct? Would be good to finish it since it should go in front of the Board tomorrow (Monday, 5th).
I also changed a couple of little typos in the text that we missed before…

Current version:

Preamble

Our economic program aims to support long-term sustainable economic growth focused on long-term development, broad improvements in quality of life, and fostering a competitive, fair, and inventive economic environment. In this regard, we believe it is necessary to consider a broader set of economic metrics besides mere immediate gross productivity. Such measures must capture the development of long-term economic opportunities, well-being, environmental and social sustainability, and successful collaboration across the whole EU.

Competitive Economic Environment

The environment of all economic activity needs to facilitate resilience and competition and stimulate and enforce transparency. This incentivizes social progress in a sustainable, fair, and democratic way. Pirates aim to protect individuals, preserve opportunities, and promote individual autonomy and well-being by dispersing and de-concentrating public and private power. Competitive markets provide a fertile ground for entrepreneurship. Competition policy should aim to prevent excessive market concentration and monopolistic practices which pose barriers for new businesses to enter markets. Facilitating opportunities for entrepreneurship, including SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) and start-ups, leads to job creation, innovation, and economic dynamism, contributing to overall prosperity. An effective competition standard should look beyond consumer welfare and be science-based. Rather than needing to sanction the abuse of a dominant position, competition policy should focus more on the prevention of market power. Competition enforcement agencies should be adequately resourced, and get institutional support, and a legal mandate. Ideally, the competition authority must be independent and shielded from direct political interference.

Trade

Pirates believe that trade and cooperation are a way towards development and shared wealth. However, we see a lot of challenges in the current trade environment. At the same time, trade agreements have been abused in the past to empower private entities at the expense of public courts, exploit communities and promote nepotism and cronyism.

We propose basic principles that we will uphold regarding international trade. Considering trade treaties, the European Parliament must ratify the treaty and the treaty must be negotiated as transparently as possible, including public hearings and comprehensive access to information. Trade should be enlarging our markets and allowing more competition, therefore trade agreements should not give out more or less hidden special favours. The ultimate goal of international trade agreements is the positive development of all involved parties. Therefore, we need to always ask for at least the most basic working standards to be upheld by our trade partners and enforce paying up for common externalities damaging us all through carbon border adjustment mechanisms and similar tools.

Trade is also an economic and political tool. We support economic sanctions against authoritarian regimes, especially the regimes that are actively undermining European security and committing crimes against humanity. These sanctions should be precisely targeted to damage the wealth of the government elites, hinder the offensive and persecuting capacities of those regimes and avoid the suffering of the common citizens as much as possible. We should not supply weapons and surveillance technologies to authoritarian regimes.

Last years have also seen a surge in protectionism and the closing of free trade in critical technological areas like microchips or renewable energy technologies. We do believe that Europe should attain the highest possible level of strategic autonomy concerning these and the need to reduce our overdependence on authoritarian regimes. The way to get that autonomy and prosperity is through trade with new partners, research, technological excellence, and cooperation. Trade wars have repeatedly proven themselves detrimental.

Taxation

The tax mix should be based on establishing an environment of fully internalized externalities of economic activities to cultivate an entrepreneurial environment and a long-term well-developing society.

To achieve this, we propose the following points: Moving a larger part of the tax burden from labour to capital. To facilitate this, tax harmonization across European jurisdictions should be further developed. This should include targeting strategic capital allocation for tax avoidance, and intentional obscuring of corporate structure (incl. public entities). We should focus on empowering local communities’ decision-making and interests regarding their local tax structure together with establishing an all-European harmonization framework (yet not unification of tax rates or tax base definitions, only framework of the shared approach). We will support global coordination on taxation, particularly in questions of international corporations.

Financial Markets and Multinational Corporations

Regulation, supervision, and taxation of the financial markets should encourage investment into long-term development strategies which are environmentally and socially sustainable. The environment should deter financial dominance, capital concentration, and for-profit short-term reallocation (e.g., stock buybacks). Speculative investments should bear heighten disincentives and should be more transparent.

European Budgetary Rules

Budgetary policy is an essential tool of economic policy. The current budgetary rules are targeted at preventing budgetary deficits and preventing member states to react in times of crisis.

We propose to discard and replace them with long-term budget sustainability assessments, and to prevent excessive budgetary imbalances.

This will allow member states to implement investment policies in spite of the defence, environmental and social challenges of our time, as well as encourage the balancing of their savings and consumption which will foster a dynamic internal market.

European Economic Integration

The next steps of European economic integration should support labour mobility, equality, and broad economic development of all European regions. Further, there should be continued support for the economic development of physical and institutional infrastructure, particularly of cross-border regions.

Cryptocurrency

We as Pirates see the potential of crypto assets and that they may have a positive role in economic development. We want to protect cash for its anonymity including digital cash.

1 Like

Repost from the old thread so we don’t get lost

Given our difficulties on the preamble, my two cents would be on the removal of " economic growth focused on" in the first sentence. It is included in long term development anyway, and the “long term” kinda suggest potential growth as well, idk.

Another suggestion, get rid of the “mere immediate” in front of “gross productivity”, because I really can’t see what’s the purpose of these adjectives in here.

These modifications would lead us to this :

Preamble

Our economic program aims to support sustainable long-term development, broad improvements in quality of life, and fostering a competitive, fair, and inventive economic environment. In this regard, we believe it is necessary to consider a broader set of economic metrics besides immediate gross productivity. Such measures must capture the development of long-term economic opportunities, well-being, environmental and social sustainability, and successful collaboration across the whole EU.

3 Likes

The difference is that the end of “economic growth” is a scientific fact, as is the calculation of Earth Overshoot Day, which is fast approaching. The earth’s natural resources are running out.

These are not cranks from the left-green spectrum.

There are many economic theories - but they are just theories, not scientific based facts. Ordoliberalism is one of them.

I have been a commercial consultant for 40 years and tend to lean towards scientific facts. But everyone is free to express his or her opinion. I don’t see a problem there.

Shortening a decision is not part of it.

JM2C.

1 Like

I’m curious of where it is stated as a fact. Tired of the “scientific high ground”. Guess you are referring to Meadows, which is already 50 years old.

No one here is contesting that sustainability has been forgotten for too long, I simply don’t get the crusade

2 Likes

The way you have it written there sounds great to me, I’d go with that.

i support your text too. Much better preamble. So, we take that?

1 Like